Hundredfold Management Services  ·  Proposal

ERCie: A Throughput Engine for HF's Post-Moratorium Appeals Queue

A retainer proposal for an intake-automation engine with a discernment layer, scoped to HF's appeals pipeline and structured around a mandatory human approval gate on every IRS-facing artifact.
Prepared for: Andrew King, Hundredfold Consulting Meeting: Monday, May 4, 2026

What We're Proposing

You're sitting on the appeal volume now in front of you - more denied quarters than your team can grind through one interview at a time, and too much captured value to walk away from. The proposal below puts an intake-automation engine in front of your team, keeps your headcount intact, and lets you pay for completed work instead of forecast capacity.

What ERCie Is

ERCie is an intake-automation engine with a discernment layer, wired into your existing HubSpot pipeline. She runs in three modes:

  1. End-to-end on revenue-decline quarters. ERCie pulls the data, validates it against the qualifying tests, generates the appeal packet, and surfaces it to your analyst at a mandatory human approval gate. On approval, the packet sends under HF's name. ERCie has no autonomous send authority - ever.
  2. Intake interviews on quarters that require client conversation. ERCie conducts the qualifying interview by text and email - asks the questions, validates the answers, and surfaces the structured findings in HubSpot. By the time the case reaches your team, every answer is captured and the packet is pre-loaded.
  3. Discernment - when ERCie hands off vs. completes. ERCie escalates to your team when (a) the client doesn't respond to intake within a defined window, (b) responses contain ambiguity or contradiction the model flags, (c) the case touches a pre-flagged edge category (partial-quarter eligibility, multi-entity returns, governmental-order-only quarters), or (d) your team flags the quarter for hands-on review during the weekly check-in. Everything else stays in ERCie's lane until the human approval gate.
What ERCie does not do. Send anything. Sign anything. Take an IRS-facing position. Every artifact that leaves HF leaves under HF's signature, with HF as practitioner of record. Your compliance posture is unchanged.

Operating Mode

The shape of the engagement is simple: ERCie absorbs the structured, repeatable work in front of the appeals queue, and your team keeps its hands on judgment calls, edge cases, and the human approval gate. That re-shapes the analyst's day from interview-driven to review-driven, and re-shapes your queue from bandwidth-bound to throughput-bound.

We are not making a measured throughput claim in this document. The honest answer is that the lift depends on how cleanly the corpus trains, how the discernment thresholds settle in week one, and what the real edge-case mix looks like in your queue. The 30 / 60 / 90-day review (below) is the validation point - if month one shows ERCie can't cleanly handle revenue-decline end-to-end, the auto-complete mode collapses back to draft-only and we re-examine the price together.

Price

$375 per completed appeal  ·  $7,500/month minimum

Recommended structure: $375 per completed appeal, with a $7,500/month floor

You pay $375 per completed appeal or $7,500 per month, whichever is higher. The $7,500/month minimum is equivalent to 20 completed appeals at the per-deal rate. A completed appeal is defined as ERCie producing a packet that (a) passes your analyst review at the human approval gate, and (b) ships to the IRS under HF's name. Drafts rejected at the approval gate don't count. Drafts sent back for iteration and then approved count once. Intake interviews that surface a non-qualifying client and never produce a packet don't count. The unit of payment is a packet that left the building under HF's signature.

Why the floor

Why $375 per appeal

It sits roughly 30x above ERCie's marginal cost (tokens + infrastructure), which leaves room for ongoing iteration and the monthly review work. It sits below your implicit per-appeal cost of an analyst handling it manually - at HF's actual loaded rates, per-analyst-appeal cost is closer to $400-450. Whole-dollar rounding for simplicity.

Headcount-equivalent defense

Practically, ERCie replaces the throughput of multiple junior ERC analysts running the same intake + drafting work in parallel. Loaded cost per analyst is ~$65-75K (base + payroll tax + benefits + tooling), so even two of them runs ~$11-12K/month in headcount alone, before recruiting drag, six-month ramp, and salary commitment carried through volume-curve uncertainty. At the floor ($7.5K/mo) or anywhere above it on per-deal volume, the engagement reads as a structural win versus the equivalent hire - and the hire stays hired whether the appeals volume holds or not.

Instant ramp, no employment-law / payroll / benefits overhead, no salary commitment to carry through whatever the post-appeals volume curve looks like, and it scales with volume without a second hiring cycle.

Scope and term

Risk Posture

Account Lead and Bandwidth

The relationship runs through a single account lead on our side - one point of contact for HF, no rotating cast, and no one from our team talking to your clients directly. The working pattern is bounded: a weekly check-in for the first month, then a monthly iteration cycle as things settle. If load grows past evening capacity on the account-lead side, we revisit the working pattern before you feel it.

Month One

What We Need From You

Next Step

If Monday's conversation lands well, the path from here is short: signed engagement letter the same week, kickoff call within 10 business days, and ERCie wired into your HubSpot pipeline before the end of May.

The only thing we need from you to start the clock is a signed engagement letter and the API access scope above.